Increase Font Size  Decrease Font Size  View as PDF   Print  
 

Is the therapeutic use of a vegetarian diet effective for bringing about improvements in weight status in adults?



Short-term (less than one year) Improvements Conclusion Statement

The therapeutic use of a vegetarian diet is an effective way to bring about short-term improvements in weight status in adults, as part of a multi-component weight management program.

Longer-term (more than one year) Improvements Conclusion Statement

The therapeutic use of a vegetarian diet as part of a multi-component weight-management program is an effective way to bring about longer-term (more than one year) improvements in weight status among adults who are compliant.

Vegetarian Diets Compared to Other Therapeutic Diets for Treating Overweight or Obesity Conclusion Statement

Compared to omnivorous diets that could be used to treat obesity, findings are mixed as to whether therapeutic vegetarian diets are more or less effective for improving weight status in adults.

Evidence Summary

Therapeutic Use of Vegetarian Diets

Observational research has often shown an association between vegetarian dietary patterns and various health benefits (Sabate, 2003). However, in part because of variations within vegetarian diets, the findings are sometimes blurred or inconsistent (see Types of Vegetarian Diets).

In order to control for the wide variation in types of vegetarian diets and practices, we limited our evidence analysis to clinical trials in which vegetarian dietary patterns were controlled and in which vegetarian diets were used as a therapeutic intervention.

Using Managed Vegetarian Diets to Treat Overweight and Obesity

We identified seventeen intervention studies in which a vegetarian diet was used therapeutically.

  • In eight of these studies overweight or obesity was the target disease
  • In nine studies the target disease was something other than obesity (e.g., cholesterol control, diabetes management, etc,). However, because these studies involved the therapeutic use of a vegetarian diet and because they also reported weight outcomes, they were included in the analysis.

We examined this research in order to answer three questions:

  1. Is the therapeutic use of a vegetarian diet effective for bringing about short-term (less than one year) improvements in weight status?
  2. Is the therapeutic use of a vegetarian dietary pattern effective for bringing about longer-term (more than one year) improvements in weight status?
  3. How does the therapeutic use of a vegetarian diet compare to omnivorous therapeutic diets for treating overweight or obesity?

Short-Term Improvements in Weight Status (Less than One Year)

The following studies reported statistically significant weight loss or changes in body composition at the end of treatment using a vegetarian diet:

All of the above interventions for weight management included the vegetarian diet as a part of a multi-component program which included such things as group support classes, individual counseling and exercise recommendations.

Studies Focused on Other Diseases

We included research on the therapeutic use of vegetarian diets for other diseases, such as diabetes or cholesterol management, when the study reported weight outcomes. We were interested in whether a medically managed vegetarian diet could bring about improvements in weight status even when they were not designed specifically to bring about weight loss.

All but one of the nine studies reported a statistically significant improvement in subjects' weight status, even when obesity was not the disease being treated (none of the diets were calorie restricted). The one study that did not show an improvement in weight status was a very short, negative-quality () clinical trial (four weeks) that compared the effects of two types of vegetarian diets on cholesterol control (Kaartinen K, Lammi K et al, 2000).

Conclusion

All but one study that met the inclusion criteria showed statistically significant improvement in weight status at post-treatment. The one study that did not find a statistically significant difference was not focused on treating overweight or obesity, was very short (four week intervention) and compared two vegetarian diets.

The therapeutic use of a vegetarian diet is an effective way to bring about short-term improvements in weight status as part of a multi-component weight-management program.

Longer-Term Improvements in Weight Status (More than One Year)

A major concern in the treatment of overweight and obesity is the maintenance of improvements in weight status. Is a medically-managed vegetarian dietary pattern effective for bringing about longer-term (more than one year) improvements in weight status?

All five studies that reported on weight status at one year or more from baseline show that improvements in weight status were maintained. Four of the studies reported follow-up measurements (that is, measurements some time after the treatment phase had stopped). All of these studies reported a maintenance of weight status.

All of the studies included the vegetarian diet as part of a multi-component support program which included such things as educational support, group meetings and exercise recommendations. The ADA Adult Weight Management Guideline recommends that weight management programs include diet, exercise and behavioral therapy components since combination therapy is more successful than using any one intervention alone. See Adult Weight Management (AWM) Comprehensive Weight Management Program.

Conclusion

The therapeutic use of a vegetarian diet as part of a multi-component program is an effective way to bring about longer-term (more than one year) improvements in weight status among those who are compliant.

Comparison of Vegetarian Diets and Other Diets

How do medically managed vegetarian diets compare to omnivorous therapeutic diets for treating overweight or obesity?

In order to answer this question we focused on research that compared two types of diet interventions: A therapeutic vegetarian diet and a therapeutic omnivorous diet. We did not compare therapeutic vegetarian diets to control or “usual” diets (that is, diets where there was no therapeutic intervention). Our question was concerned with how vegetarian diets used to treat obesity compared to other diets used to treat obesity.

Conclusion

Compared to omnivorous diets that could be used to treat obesity, findings are mixed as to whether therapeutic vegetarian diets are more or less effective for improving weight status.


Overview Table Key

Indicates a statistically significant decrease from baseline or lower measure in a comparison
Indicates that there is no statistically significant change from baseline or difference in a comparison
Indicates a statistically significant increase from baseline or higher measure in a comparison.



View full table in new window
Author, Year,
Study Design,
Class,
Rating
Sample Characteristics (N, Sex, Race, Location) Comparison or Intervention Diets Length of Diet Intervention, Attrition Rate Target Disease, Other Treatments or Interventions Obesity Related Outcomes
Barnard Cohen 2006 

Study Design: Randomized controlled trial

Class: A 

Rating: Positive

Initial N:

Screened: n=1,049

Met criteria: n=99 randomized to vegan group n=49 and ADA group n=50

Attrition (final N):

8 from ADA group and 3 from vegan group did not complete measures at week 22.

Age:

Mean vegan group: 56.7 (35-82 years); ADA group: 54.6 (27-80 years).

Ethnicity:

Majority of the sample non-Hispanic

 

 

Randomly assigned to a low-fat vegan diet or a diet following the 2003 ADA guidelines

 

 

Length: 22 weeks

Attrition: 8 from ADA group and 3 from vegan group

 

 

Target: type 2 diabetes

Other: glycemic level, plasma lipid level, and weight

 

 

Change in anthropometric measures:

significantly lower than baseline or significantly lower than omnivore comparison, no difference from baseline measure or no difference from omnivore comparison group.

Weight (kg):

Veg group: -5.8 ±4.4

Omnivore group: -4.3 ±4.4

BMI (kg/m2):

Veg group: -2.1 ±1.5

Omnivore group: -1.5 ±1.5

Waist (cm):

Veg group: -5.3 ±4.4

Omnivore group: -2.8 ±4.7

Waist-to-hip ratio (cm):

Veg group: -0.02 ±0.03

Omnivore group: 0.01 ±0.04

 
Bhumisawasdi, Vanna et al, 2006 

Study Design: Before-After Study

Class: D 

Rating: Negative

Initial N: 44 (10 males, 34 females)
Age: 31-50 years, N=7; 51-75 years, N=37
Ethnicity: Thai
Location: Thailand

 

Macrobiotic diet (very restrictive vegan)

 

Length of intervention was not controlled; anywhere from 2-14 weeks.

 

Target: Diabetes type II
Other treatments: Comprehensive and intensive residential holistic treatment program

 

Body Weight
 Change from baseline (measures not given)

 
Burke LE, Hudson AG et al, 2007 

Study Design:

Class: A 

Rating: Positive

N: 132 at 18-month follow-up (86.93% females)
Age: Mean age 43.3±9.0 to 44.9±8.5
Location: Pittsbugh, PA, US

 

Calorie- and fat-restricted ovolactovegetarian diet
Calorie and fat-restricted standard omnivorous weight loss diet
(Kcal deficit depended on initial weight: 1,200-1,800kcal/day)

 

Length of intervention: 12 months, follow-up at 18 months
Attrition rate: 25% of participants at follow-up; 20% for those preferring LOV; 24.4% for those not preferring LOV

 

Target disease: Obesity
Other treatments: Physical activity, group counseling, food diary

 

Weight
Decrease from baseline to 18 months
LOV preferred: -5.3±6.2
LOV not preferred: -7.9±8.1
Std preferred: -3.9±6.1
Std not preferred: -8.0±7.8
Diet Effect
No significant difference among groups

 
Burke LE, Styn MA et al, 2006 

Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial

Class: A 

Rating: Positive

Initial N: 200 at randomization
Attrition (final N): 182 (91%)
Age: Average, 44.1±8.6
Ethnicity: Mainly Caucasian

 

Calorie and fat restrictied diets (both 1,200-1,500kcal for women and 1,500-1,800kcal for men; 25% fat):
Standard treatment
Standard treatment ovolactovegetarian

 

12-month intervention, 6-month maintenance phase.
Diet group attrition rates
Vegetarian diet preferred:
16.7%
Vegetarian diet randomly assigned: 12.5%
Omnivore diet preferred: 12.5%
Omnivore diet randomly assigned: 14%

 

Target: Weight management
Other interventions: 32 treatment sessions of standard cognitive behavioral therapy for weight management over a period of 12 months.

 

Change from baseline to 6 months for the combined sample (all changes significant for the overall sample):
Vegetarian diet
Weight: -7.50±6.00  ( veg vs. omnivore)
BMI:- 3.21±2.06 ( veg vs. omnivore)
Waist circumference (cm): -9.37±5.60 (men), -6.12±7.34 (women) ( veg vs. omnivore)
Omnivore diet
Weight: -0.97±6.53
BMI: -2.83±2.07
Waist circumference (cm): -11.78±10.61 (men), -5.50±6.31 (women)
Changes between diet groups were not significant.
Significance of within group changes from baseline were not reported.
Veg subjects who were 100% compliant had statistically greater improvement than those who were not compliant.

 
Dansinger ML, Gleason JA et al, 2005 

Study Design: Randomized controlled trial

Class: A 

Rating: Positive

Final N: 93 completers after 1 year (58% overall completion)
Age: Mean 49±11 years
Ethnicity: Not reported
Location: Boston, Massachusetts

 

3 Omnivore diets: Atkins, Zone, Weight Watchers
1 Vegetarian diet: Ornish

 

Length of intervention: 1 year
Attrition rates
Atkins: 48%
Ornish (vegetarian): 50%
Zone: 35%
Weight Watchers: 35%
No sig diff between groups

 

Target diseases: Obesity and cardiac risk factors
Other interventions: Exercise recommendations, external support

 

Body Composition
Veg diet change from baseline (comparison)
Weight, kg: -3.3 (7.3) ( veg vs. omnivore diets)
BMI: -1.4 (2.5) ( veg vs. omnivore diets)
Waist circumference, cm: -2.2 (5.5) ( veg vs. omnivore diets)

 
Daubenmier JJ, Weidner G et al, 2007 

Study Design: blank - to be determined

Class: C 

Rating: Neutral

N: 869 (293 females, 576 males)
Age: Mean, 59±8.9 for males; 60±9.4 females
Ethnicity: 94.2% white males; 95.1% white females
Location: WV, PA, IL and NE, US

 

Non-calorie restricted lactoovovegetarian diet (no comparison diet)

 

Length of intervention: 3 months
Attrition: 4.5%

 

Target disease: CVD
Other interventions: Behavioral, physical activity

 

Weight
 over time,  men vs. women

 
de Mello VD, Zelmanovitz T et al, 2006 

Study Design: Randomized Crossover Trial

Class: A 

Rating: Positive

N: 17 (crossover design for all diets)
Ethnicity: Not available
Location: Brazil

 

Vegetarian, low-protein diet
Chicken diet
Usual diet

 

4-week intervention per diet

 

Target: Diabetes Type II
4 weeks on each diet

 

Diet Effects Comparison
Baseline to end of diet phase
BMI (kg/m2)
Change from usual diet
Veg:
Chicken:
 veg vs. chicken
Waist circumference (cm)
Change from usual diet
Veg:  
Chicken: 
 veg vs. chicken
Waist-to-hip ratio
Change from usual diet:
Veg:  
Chicken: 
 veg vs. chicken

 
Hakala P and Karvetti RL, 1989 

Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial

Class: A 

Rating: Positive

N: N=110; lactovegetarian, N=31 (23 female, 8 male); mixed group, N=37 (27 female, 10 male); control group, N=42 (32 female, 10 male)
Age: Mean, 38 years
Ethnicity: Not identified
Location: Finland

 

Lactovegetarian (1,200kcal/day)
Mixed diet (1,200kcal/day)
Controls (no energy deficit)

 

Length of Diet Intervention: 10 weeks; follow-up, 1 year
Drop-out rate was 33% for ovolactovegetarian (23% giving up the diet), 20% for mixed diet group, and 5% for the control group

 

Target: Weight management
Group meetings once a week for intervention groups. Group lectures by medical and psychological professionals.

 

Percentage of weight loss or gained weight in the groups at 1 year
Lactovegetarian
Baseline to one year:  
Veg vs. Mixed at one year:
Veg vs. Control at one year:
Mixed
Baseline to one year
Mixed vs. Control at one year:
Control
Baseline to one year
Mean weight loss in both treatment groups was statistically significant (P<0.001).
Measures of body composition also decreased significantly for both treatment groups at 1 year.

 
Jenkins DJ, Kendall CW et al, 2003 (vn) 

Study Design:

Class: A 

Rating: Positive

Initial N: 55
Attrition (final N): 46; 25 males, 21 females
Age: 59 (1) years; range, 36-85y
Ethnicity: Primarily white
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

 

Control diet + placebo
Control diet + statin
Dietary Portfolio diet + placebo (ovolactovegetarian)

 

Length of intervention: 4 weeks
Attrition rate
Control: 93% (3%)
Statin: 95% (3%)
Portfolio (veg): 94% (3%)

 

Disease: cholesterol lowering

 

Body Weight (kg)
Change from baseline
Portfolio diet: -0.4 (0.2) ( veg vs. statin) ( veg vs. control)

 
Jenkins DJ, Kendall CW, et al 2003 (Metabolism) 

Study Design: Randomized controlled trial

Class: A 

Rating: Positive

Final N: 25, one dropped out of the Portfolio diet group; (16 men/9 women)
Age: 60±9.9 (range 36-85 y)
Location: Toronto, Canada

 

Portfolio Diet (vegan)
Very low saturated fat ovolactovegetarian

 

Length of intervention: 4 weeks
1 subject dropped from Portfolio Diet group

 

Target disease: cardiovascular risk factors

 

Weight
Change from baseline
Portfolio (vegan):  -1.1±0.4, ( portfolio vs. lactoovo)
Lactoovoveg:  -1.2±0.5

 
Kaartinen K, Lammi K et al, 2000 

Study Design: Non-Randomized Controlled Trial

Class: C 

Rating: Negative

Final N (all female)
Intervention group (vegan diet): 18
Control group (omnivorous diet): 15 
Mean age
Intervention group:51
Control group: 52
Location
Finland

 

"Living food" vegan diet
Self selected diet (no diet prescription)

 

Length of intervention: 3 months
Attrition rate
Vegan diet: 14.2%
Omnivore diet: 11.8%
Four subjects in the vegan group reported eating fish during the treatment period.

 

Target: Fibromyalgia
An instructor was available for consultation if the subject requested help with her diet.

 

BMI decreased at the end of intervention period among those following the vegan diet.  
Vegan
Baseline to end of treatment  (veg vs. control )
Baseline to 5 month follow-up veg vs. control
Control
Baseline to end of treatment
Participants discontinued vegan diet after intervention period at which point BMI increased. (BMI values not provided.)

 
Karlsson J, Hallgren P et al, 1994 

Study Design: Randomized controlled trial

Class: A 

Rating: Positive

Final N: 28 subjects (all women)
Age: 25-65 years old (mean age, 43 years)
Ethnicity: Not specified
Location: Sweden

 

Lactovegetarian (1,300kcal)
Omnivore (1,300kcal)

 

Length of intervention: 2 years
Attrition: 7% (N=2)

 

Target disease: Obesity
Other treatments: Individualized nutrition counseling

 

No significant difference between diet groups on any overweight measures. ( veg vs. omnivore)
Weight change at 24 months (both groups, compliers):  -3.9±6.9 (P<0.001)

 
Kestin M, Rouse IL et al, 1989 

Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; incomplete block design

Class: A 

Rating: Neutral

N: 26 males
Age: 28-64y
Ethnicity: Not specified
Location: Australia

 

Two diet interventions per subject, switching between two diets (6-week duration for each diet). Diets designed at four energy levels: 2,100, 2,400, 2,700 and 3,000kcal/day
High fat, typical Australian diet (AUS)
Low-fat, lactoovovegetarian diet (OLV)
OLV diet with 60% of plant protein replaced with lean meat (LM)

 

Crossover combination of 2 diets, 4 weeks per diet

 

Target: Cardiovascular disease

 

Baseline weght (kg): 80.5
Post-treatment weight (kg)
Australian diet: 79.7
Ovolactovegetarian: 79.0 ( v. Aus,  v. LM)
Lean meat diet: 79.8

 
Mahon AK, Flynn MG et al, 2007 

Study Design: Randomized controlled trial

Class: A 

Rating: Positive

N: 54 post-menopausal women
Race: Caucasian
Location: Greater Lafayette Indiana

 

Three calorie deficit (1,250/day) higher protein diets (varied by type of protein) with one control diet:
Beef group (250kcal/day of cooked beef)
Chicken group (250kcal/day cooked chicken breast and 10 grams butter)
Ovolactovegetarian group
Control group.

 

Length of Diet Intervention: 9 weeks
Attrition: 12% for all groups combined

 

Target: Body composition and markers of metabolic and cardiovascular health
Individualized dietary counseling twice per week

 

Change from baseline to 9 weeks
( relative to controls)
Veg group
Weight: -5.6±1.8
BMI: -2.1±0.7
% body fat: -2.1±1.5
Fat-free mass: -1.7±1.0
Beef group
Weight: -6.6±2.7
BMI: -2.5±1.1 
% body fat: -2.1±1.8 
Fat-free mass: -2.2±1.3
Chicken group
Weight: -7.9±2.6
BMI: -3.0±1.2
% body fat: 3.3±1.7
Fat-free mass: -2.3±1.0
All changes in body composition measures were significantly improved relative to the control diet.
There were no significant differences in changes of body composition measures among intervention diet groups except: The Chicken group lost significantly more weight and reduced BMI more than the Vegetarian group.

 
Marniemi J, Seppänen A et al, 1990 

Study Design: Randomized controlled trial

Class: A 

Rating: Neutral

Final N
Lactovegetarian group: 31 (23 women, 8 men)
Mixed diet: 37 (27 women, 10 men)
Control group: 42 (32 women, 10 men)
Age
Mean, 38 years
Ethnicity
Not reported
Location
Finland

 

Lactovegetarian: N=31, 1,200kcal/day
Mixed diet: N=37, 1,200kcal/day
Control: N=42)

 

Length of intervention: One year
Attrition: Not reported

 

Target: Weight management and lipid metabolism

 

Weight (kg)
Lactovegetarian
Baseline: 98.3±5.3
One year: 89.1±4.4
Mixed
Baseline: 98.3±4.3
One year: 84.3±3.8
Control
Baseline: 97.1±4.4
One year: 98.7±4.3
Diet effect: significant diet effect at one year.

 
Barnard ND, Scialli AR et al, 2000 

Study Design: Randomized Crossover Trial

Class: A 

Rating: Positive

N: 51; 35 completers
Sex: Female
Age: 22-48 years old (mean, 36.1)
Race/Ethnicity: Mixed
Location: Washington, DC area

 

Low-fat, vegetarian diet
Usual diet with placebo supplement

 

One full menstrual cycle
Attrition: 31%

 

Target: Altering serum lipids
Behavioral intervention

 

Measures at baseline and end of treatment (approx 2 months)
Baseline values
Weight: 69.4±12.9
BMI: 25.5±5.2
Vegetarian diet post-treatment phase
Weight (kg): 66.9±12.5 ( baseline vs. post-veg)
BMI (kg/m2): 24.6±4.9 ( baseline vs. post-veg)
Supplement post treatment phase
Weight (kg): 68.5±13.0 ( baseline vs. post-supplement)
BMI (kg/m2): 25.2±5.2 ( baseline vs. post-supplement)
Changes in weight were significantly associated with baseline BMI.

 
Turner-McGrievy GM, Barnard ND et al, 2007 

Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial

Class: A 

Rating: Positive

N: 31 in Vegan group; 31 in NCEP group
Sex: All female
Race/Ethnicity: Mixed
Location: Washington, DC area

 

Vegan
NCEP (similar to the current NCEP Therapeutic Lifestyle Changes diet)

 

14 weeks
Vegan group: 16%
NCEP group: 10%

 

Target: Weight management
Behavioral training
Support group meetings for subset of each diet group

 

Weight loss
Vegan group
Weight, kg year 1: -4.9
Weight, kg year 2: -3.1
NCEP group
Weight, kg year 1: -1.8
Weight, kg year 2: -0.8
Veg vs. NCEP at one and two years

 

Quality Rating Summary
For a summary of the Quality Rating results, click here.
Worksheets
Barnard ND, Cohen J, Jenkins DJ, Turner-McGrievy G, Gloede L, Jaster B, Seidl K, Green AA, Talpers S. A low-fat vegan diet improves glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factors in a randomized clinical trial in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006 Aug;29(8):1777-83.

Barnard, ND, Scialli, AR et al. Effectiveness of a low-fat vegetarian diet in altering serum lipids in healthy premenopausal women. Am J of Cardiology. 2000 (Apr); 85: 969-972. 

Bhumisawasdi J, Vanna O, Surinpang N. The self-reliant system for alternative care of diabetes mellitus patients--experience macrobiotic management in Trad Province. J Med Assoc Thai. 2006 Dec; 89 (12): 2,104-2,115.

Burke LE, Hudson AG, Warziski MT, Styn MA, Music E, Elci OU, Sereika SM. Effects of a vegetarian diet and treatment preference on biochemical and dietary variables in overweight and obese adults: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Sep; 86 (3): 588-596.

Burke LE, Styn MA, Steenkiste AR, Music E, Warziski M, Choo J. A randomized clinical trial testing treatment preference and two dietary options in behavioral weight management: preliminary results of the impact of diet at six months: PREFER study. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006 Nov; 14 (11): 2,007-2,017.

Dansinger ML, Gleason JA, Griffith JL, Selker HP, Schaefer EJ. Comparison of the Atkins, Ornish, Weight Watchers, and Zone diets for weight loss and heart disease risk reduction. JAMA 2005; 293: 43-53.

Daubenmier JJ, Weidner G, Sumner MD, Mendell N, Merritt-Worden T, Studley J, Ornish D. The contribution of changes in diet, exercise, and stress management to changes in coronary risk in women and men in the multisite cardiac lifestyle intervention program. Ann Behav Med. 2007 Feb; 33 (1): 57-68.

de Mello VD, Zelmanovitz T, Perassolo MS, Azevedo MJ, Gross JL. Withdrawal of red meat from the usual diet reduces albuminuria and improves serum fatty acid profile in type 2 diabetes patients with macroalbuminuria. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 May; 83 (5): 1,032-1,038.

Hakala P, Karvetti R. Weight reduction on lactovegetarian and mixed diets. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1989; 43: 421-430.

Jenkins DJ, Kendall CW, Marchie A, Faulkner DA, Wong JM, de Souza R, Emam A, Parker TL, Vidgen E, Lapsley KG, Trautwein EA, Josse RG, Leiter LA, Connelly PW. Effects of a dietary portfolio of cholesterol-lowering foods vs. lovastatin on serum lipids and C-reactive protein. JAMA. 2003 Jul 23; 290 (4): 502-510.

Jenkins DJ, Kendall CW, Marchie A, Faulkner D, Vidgen E, Lapsley KG, Trautwein EA, Parker TL, Josse RG, Leiter LA, Connelly PW. The effect of combining plant sterols, soy protein, viscous fibers, and almonds in treating hypercholesterolemia. Metabolism. 2003 Nov; 52(11): 1478-83

Kaartinen K, Lammi K, Hypen M, Nenonen M, Hanninen O, Rauma AL. Vegan diet alleviates fibromyalgia symptoms. Scand J Rheumatol. 2000; 29 (5): 308-313.

Karlsson J, Hallgren P, Kral J, Lindroos A, Sjostrom L, Sullivan M. Predictors and effects of long-term dieting on mental well being and weight loss in obese women. Appetite. 1994; 23: 15-26.

Kestin, M, Rouse, IL, Correll, RA, Nestel, PJ. Cardiovascular disease risk factors in free-living men: Comparison of two prudent diets, one based on lactoovovegetarianism and the other allowing lean meat. Am J Clin Nutr. 1989; 50: 280-287.

Mahon AK, Flynn MG, Stewart LK, McFarlin BK, Iglay HB, Mattes RD, Lyle RM, Considine RV, Campbell WW. Protein intake during energy restriction:  effects on body composition and markers of metabolic and cardiovascular health in postmenopausal women. J Am Coll Nutr. 2007 Apr; 26 (2): 182-189.

Marniemi J, Seppänen A, Hakala P. Long-term effects on lipid metabolism of weight reduction on lactovegetarian and mixed diet. Int J Obes. 1990 Feb; 14 (2): 113-125.

Turner-McGrievy GM, Barnard ND, Scialli AR. A two-year randomized weight loss trial comparing a vegan diet to a more moderate low-fat diet. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007 Sep; 15 (9): 2,276-2,281.

Your Opinion Counts
Was the information on this page helpful to you?
Yes No
* This is a user feedback tool only. If you have specific questions requiring
a response, please use the contact link at the top of this page.
Copyright 2013 © Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (A.N.D.), All Rights Reserved  |  Disclaimer